Print   Close Window

 

Note: Large images and tables on this page may necessitate printing in landscape mode.

Copyright ©2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies.  All rights reserved.

Emergency Medicine Atlas > Part 2. Specialty Areas > Chapter 18. Wounds and Soft Tissue Injuries >

 

 

Wound Cleaning and Irrigation

Associated Clinical Features

Wound cleaning and thorough irrigation are the most important steps in wound care in terms of reducing bacterial contamination and the subsequent risk for wound infection. Although they are time-consuming, failure to go through these procedures can result in infection or a cosmetically unacceptable scar.

Wound soaking (Fig. 18.1) is commonly used to loosen debris and coagulated blood. While soaking can assist in removing gross contaminants, it is not a substitute for irrigation. Irrigation is the most effective way to cleanse a wound of debris and contaminants as well as to reduce the bacteria count. Normal saline is the irrigation fluid of choice. An acceptable alternative is 10%povidone-iodine (Betadine) solution. When diluted to a 1% concentration (1 part per 10 parts saline), it can be safely applied to wounds while retaining its bactericidal activity.

Figure 18.1

 

Wound Soaking Soaking is an appropriate method for loosening debris and coagulated blood. While freeing the physician to perform other duties, soaking should never be used as a substitute for careful, thorough cleaning and irrigation. (Courtesy of Matthew D. Sztajnkrycer, MD, PhD.)

Emergency Department Treatment and Disposition

Prior to wound cleansing and irrigation, the patient is made comfortable and given adequate anesthesia. It is prudent to have the patient lie supine so as to avoid possible vagally mediated responses to pain or the sight of wound manipulation. Gauze sponges soaked in 10%povidone-iodine solution diluted 1:10 to 1:20 may be used for cleansing the wound periphery. The sponges can be used for gentle mechanical scrubbing of a grossly contaminated wound. Cleansing continues until the area is visibly free from contaminants. Hair can be cleansed like skin and need not be removed unless it impedes the placement of sutures or staples. Removal of eyebrow hair is discouraged because of its slow or absent regrowth.

High-pressure irrigation is more effective than low-pressure irrigation in cleaning wounds. An 18- or 19-gauge intravenous catheter sheath or a commercially available splash shield, either attached to a 20- or 30-mL syringe, will generate a pressure stream of 5 to 8 psi (Figs. 18.2, 18.3). A typical bulb system's pressure stream is only 0.5 to 1 psi. The higher-pressure systems have been shown to decrease the risk of infection. Pulsatile irrigation systems, which can generate pressures of 50 to 70 psi, are effective in lowering bacteria counts and infection rates in large, grossly contaminated wounds, but they may cause trauma to wound margins. They offer no advantage for routine wounds cared for in the ED. Pulsatile irrigation is reserved for mutilating injuries, such as those caused by a lawn mower. Sustained high-pressure irrigation systems are associated with an increased incidence of wound infection.

Figure 18.2

 

High Pressure Irrigation Devices The ideal pressure for routine wound irrigation is 5–8 psi. This can be easily achieved through the use of a 20 to 30 cc syringe attached to an 18 or 19 gauge intravenous catheter sheath (top), or a commercially available device with splash shield (bottom: Zerowet Splashshield, Zerowet, Inc, Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA). (Courtesy of Matthew D. Sztajnkrycer, MD, PhD.)

 

Figure 18.3

 

Wound Irrigation After adequate anesthesia, an infected animal bite is opened and thoroughly irrigated using a 30 cc syringe and commercial splash shield. Note that even with the attached splash shield, there can be significant splatter and potential for body fluid exposure. Universal precautions should be followed at all times. (Courtesy of Matthew D. Sztajnkrycer, MD, PhD.)

It has been suggested that 500 to 1000 mL of irrigation fluid, or 60 mL/cm of wound length, should be used for most uncomplicated wounds. Debris that cannot be irrigated from the wound is either scrubbed or sharply debrided using iris scissors or a scalpel with a number 15 blade. The tissue should appear pink and viable, with a scant amount of fresh bleeding indicating good vascular supply.

Clinical Pearls

1. No matter how small the wound, universal blood and body fluid precautions, including gloves and face shield, should always be observed.

2. Antibiotics are no substitute for thorough wound cleansing and irrigation.

3. Povidone-iodine combined with an ionic detergent (Betadine scrub) is toxic to components of an open wound and is not recommended for wound irrigation or cleansing.

4. Shaving the eyebrow for wound repair is contraindicated, since hair in this area may not regrow.

 

Wound Exploration

Associated Clinical Features

All wounds require a thorough examination, including direct inspection and exploration. This can determine the presence of foreign bodies as well as injuries to nerves, tendons, blood vessels, joints, and other structures.

Emergency Department Treatment and Disposition

The patient must be comfortable for adequate wound exploration. Local or regional anesthesia is used, and the area is thoroughly cleaned and irrigated. Assess nerve function prior to anesthesia. The simplest way to control bleeding is by direct pressure. Should this fail, gauze moistened with 1:10000 epinephrine or tourniquets (Fig. 18.4) may be used for short periods. If epinephrine is used, the gauze should not be applied for longer than 5 min, and its use is contraindicated on fingers, toes, ears, the penis, and the nose tip.

Figure 18.4

 

Finger Ring Tourniquet The key to proper wound exploration is adequate hemostasis and subsequent exposure. The ring tourniquet is an effective means of hemostasis. Removal after the procedure is important to prevent finger ischemia and necrosis. Another effective method of hemostasis involves using a Penrose drain tightened with hemostats. (Courtesy of Matthew D. Sztajnkrycer, MD, PhD.)

 

Adequate exposure of the wound can be achieved with hemostats used to separate wound edges (Fig. 18.5). The hemostats are applied to the superficial fascia, not the dermis, as that might injure and further devitalize tissue. Small self-restraining devices, such as Wheatlanders retractors, can further assist in exposure. If exposure is still not adequate despite hemostasis and separation, the wound margins may be slightly extended to allow better visualization. Extension is performed by using a scalpel with a number 15 blade or fine iris scissors. The wound is extended from one end, through the epidermis and dermis only, to avoid further injury to underlying structures. Once the superficial fascia has been exposed, it may be carefully and bluntly dissected using forceps or scissors.

Figure 18.5

 

Wound Exploration Once hemostasis has been obtained, in this case through the use of an inflated blood pressure cuff, the wound can be exposed and properly explored. Exploration reveals the two severed ends of an extensor tendon. (Courtesy of Matthew D. Sztajnkrycer, MD, PhD.)

Clinical Pearls

1. Scalp lacerations should be explored digitally to palpate for depressed skull fractures.

2. After functional testing, all wounds over tendons should be explored to determine tendon integrity. This examination should include visualization of the tendon through its range of motion, with particular attention to limb position at the time of injury. In the neutral hand position, a tendon laceration may be remote from the wound site.

3. Never probe a wound blindly or blindly attempt to control bleeding with hemostats.

 

Wound Foreign Bodies

Associated Clinical Features

Every foreign body has the potential to act as a nidus for infection and to impair wound healing. The majority of wound debris may be removed through meticulous, copious irrigation. However, direct visualization and removal with instruments may be required. Objects can either be inert (nonreactive) or organic (reactive). Examples of inert objects include bullets, needles, and metal objects. While these may cause chronic pain, they do not provoke an inflammatory response. Organic materials—such as wood, bone, stone, rubber, and soil—may cause infection and must be completely removed. The most common objects retained in hand wounds are, in decreasing order of frequency, wood splinters, glass fragments, metallic objects, and needles. Plain radiographs may be used to identify tooth fragments, metals, and most glass (Fig. 18.6). Ultrasound may play a minor role in wound foreign body identification, although it is not routinely practical. Direct inspection is the preferred method.

Figure 18.6

 

Radiodensity of Common Foreign Bodies The plain radiograph demonstrates the radiodensity of common foreign bodies. Counterclockwise from top left: pebbles, paper clip fragment, wood splinter, hollow needle, lightbulb glass, dark ("beer bottle") glass, transparent glass, and automobile windshield glass. Note that, although faint, the wood splinter is visible on the plain radiograph. Ruler markings are in centimeters. (Courtesy of Matthew D. Sztajnkrycer, MD, PhD.)

Differential Diagnosis

Apparent foreign bodies in wounds may represent open fractures, blood or fibrin coagulum, or neurovascular structures.

Emergency Department Treatment and Disposition

Patient reliability in determining the presence of a foreign body is inaccurate in approximately half of all cases. Certain clinical situations should raise the suspicion of retained foreign bodies. These include lacerations caused by broken glass, perioral injuries in association with traumatic loss of dentition, and injuries to the hands and feet with needles, nails, or splinters. Prior to anesthesia, one may elicit a foreign-body sensation by gently running gloved fingers over the wound. After adequate hemostasis and anesthesia have been implemented, gentle probing of the wound with a hemostat will generate a distinct "grating" sensation in the presence of some foreign bodies. However, aggressive probing is discouraged. Good hemostasis cannot be overemphasized. Even small amounts of blood can impair exploration.

Suspicion of a retained foreign body mandates local wound exploration and the consideration of radiographic (Fig. 18.7) or ultrasound evaluation. Nearly 80% of objects can be identified on plain radiographs. More specifically, 95% of glass fragments greater than 2 mm in size can be identified through the use of plain radiographs; fragments as small as 0.5 mm can be identified in 50 to 60% of cases. Nonradiodense objects, including wood, chicken bones, and some plastics, may still be identified as filling defects or outlined by air drawn into the wound at the time of injury.

Figure 18.7

 

Radiodensity of Common Foreign Bodies in Tissues The paper clip, dark glass, and wood splinter (top to bottom) described above were inserted into chicken legs and radiographs taken. The wooden splinter is no longer clearly visible within the soft tissue of the chicken. For purposes of foreign-body localization, a minimum of two radiographic views at 90 degrees to one another are obtained and the site of the foreign body entry clearly marked. (Courtesy of Matthew D. Sztajnkrycer, MD, PhD.)

The decision to remove inert objects is based upon location and potential for subsequent tissue damage and functional limitation. Inert objects need not be removed and will frequently be encapsulated within soft tissue, causing no sequelae. While biologically inert, glass foreign bodies are frequently symptomatic and all but the smallest fragments should be removed. All organic objects have to be removed. Localization and retrieval of identified foreign bodies can be complicated, and time-consuming; consultation may be required.

Clinical Pearls

1. A thorough history of wound mechanism can alert the treating health care worker to the potential for a retained foreign body.

2. An alert patient often may be able to report a foreign-body sensation in the wound. This "feeling" should prompt thorough wound exploration and consideration of radiographs or ultrasound.

3. In attempting to locate an object with radiographs, the laceration is marked and two views of the area, at 90 degrees to one another, are obtained for proper spatial orientation. A paper clip taped to the wound edge is often used.

4. Missed retained foreign bodies are a very common source of litigation in emergency medicine.

 

Traumatic Wounds

Associated Clinical Features

Traumatic surface wounds are usually caused by one of three mechanisms: shearing, tension, or compression. Such a division helps to guide management decisions, predict the chance of infection, and determine the extent of eventual scar formation.

Shearing Injuries

These are caused by sharp objects, such as glass shards or knives; they generate a simple division of tissues (Figs. 18.8, 18.9). They are low-energy injuries, with minimal tissue destruction. The majority of uncomplicated shearing injuries (i.e., those not involving a neurovascular or other anatomically important structure) can be repaired primarily in the ED. They have a low incidence of wound infection; scar formation is usually minimal and cosmetically acceptable.

Figure 18.8

 

Linear Laceration A large but uncomplicated linear leg laceration is demonstrated. Given the depth and gaping nature of the wound, it can be closed using a layered closure to remove surface tension at the wound edges and promote a more cosmetically acceptable outcome. (Courtesy of Alan B. Storrow, MD.)

 

Figure 18.9

 

Linear Laceration A long linear laceration involving the forehead and scalp, with exposed galea. The wound is explored and palpated for evidence of a depressed or open linear skull fracture. Closure of large galeal lacerations is recommended to prevent spread of infection. Large frontal galeal lacerations are also repaired to prevent a cosmetic deformity of the frontalis muscle. (Courtesy of Kevin J. Knoop, MD, MS.)

 

Puncture wounds are typically due to sharp, elongated objects that pierce the skin and penetrate into deeper tissues (Fig. 18.10). Such wounds have a higher potential for infection, foreign-body retention, or underlying structure injury.

Figure 18.10

 

Puncture Wound A puncture wound to the foot with a contaminated garden instrument. Tetanus status must be carefully addressed in such an injury. A radiograph of the foot demonstrated no associated bony injuries. (Courtesy of Matthew D. Sztajnkrycer, MD, PhD.)

Tension or Partial Avulsion Injuries

These occur when objects strike the skin at a sharp angle, commonly generating a triangular flap (Fig. 18.11). A flap of this type results in vascular disruption to the two sides of the wound and thus is at risk for further compromise, ischemia, and necrosis. The energy required to generate such an injury is greater than that needed for shearing injuries; the result is greater tissue destruction and an increased potential for ischemia (Fig. 18.12). These two factors place the partial avulsion injury at increased risk for wound infection and scar formation. Care must be taken during examination and repair to preserve the remaining vascular supply to the flap; otherwise the flap may become ischemic. In addition, distal-based partial avulsion injuries are at an even greater risk for vascular compromise.

Figure 18.11

 

Partial Avulsion Injury This patient has sustained a typical partial avulsion laceration from a fall onto the edge of a staircase. Note the triangular "flap" in the upper left quadrant of the wound. Closure of partial avulsion injuries must be particularly meticulous to reduce any further compromise of the flap tip's vascular supply. (Courtesy of Alan B. Storrow, MD.)

 

Figure 18.12

 

Degloving Avulsion-Type Injury The patient sustained a complex degloving injury after her lower extremity became tangled in a rope while she was water-skiing. (Courtesy of Alan B. Storrow, MD.)

Crush or Compression Injuries

These occur when a blunt object strikes tissue at a right angle, imparting a high degree of kinetic energy. This force results in significant underlying tissue destruction of the skin and underlying supportive fascial layers. Crush injuries are typically ragged, with irregular wound edges and a complex laceration pattern (Fig. 18.13). Despite meticulous wound care and careful primary closure, the resulting scars may be cosmetically poor.

Figure 18.13

 

Crush (Compression) Injury A fall from a bicycle has resulted in a complex stellate laceration, characterized by ragged, irregular wound edges. The potentially high forces involved in producing a crush wound may be sufficient to cause deeper damage. Computed tomography of the head unfortunately demonstrated a left frontal hemorrhagic contusion. (Courtesy of Matthew D. Sztajnkrycer, MD, PhD.)

Differential Diagnosis

The differential for a traumatic wound includes other mechanisms of laceration: avulsion, partial or complete amputation, abrasion, hematoma, or contusion.

Emergency Department Treatment and Disposition

All patients with traumatic wounds, regardless of mechanism, should have their tetanus immunization status addressed (Table 18.1). The physical examination is directed to functional and neurovascular status. To obtain optimal wound healing, adequate hemostasis, thorough irrigation, removal of devitalized and contaminated tissues, and appropriate closure tension must be achieved. All wounds must be thoroughly inspected for the presence of foreign bodies and underlying injuries. Plain radiographs are appropriate to help rule out open fractures and may be useful in the identification of certain foreign bodies. If open fractures are suspected or confirmed, intravenous antibiotics are administered and an orthopedic surgeon is consulted. Repair of traumatic wounds depends on the depth, complexity, and location of the wound. Deep wounds are closed in layers or by using a vertical mattress technique to remove dead space and take tension off the wound. Superficial wounds may be repaired with staples, simple interrupted sutures, or running sutures. In certain circumstances, Steri-Strips or adhesive glues may be warranted.

Table 18.1 Recommendations for Tetanus Prophylaxis

 

 

Clean, Minor Wounds

All Other Woundsa
 

Tetanus Immunization Status

Td

TIG

Td

TIG

Unknown or < 3 doses

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

> 3 Doses

 

 

 

 

  Last dose < 5 years

No

No

No

No

  Last dose 5–10 years

No

No

Yes

No

  Last dose > 10 years

Yes

No

Yes

No

 

Key: Td, tetanus-diphtheria toxoid; TIG, tetanus immune globulin (250 U).

a Defined as contaminated wounds, puncture wounds, avulsion injuries, burns, crush injuries.

Source: Adapted from Hollander JE, Singer AJ: State of the art: laceration management. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 34:356–367.

Clinical Pearls

1. Shearing injury is the most common wound mechanism seen in the ED.

2. The vascular supply to the flap is tenuous and improper closure may further compromise the tissue, especially at the tip. A repair using a corner stitch will help minimize further ischemia.

3. Crush injuries have an increased susceptibility to infection. Thorough cleansing, copious irrigation, and judicious debridement are required.

 

Ear Lacerations

Associated Clinical Features

The ear is composed of a poorly vascularized cartilaginous skeleton covered by tightly adherent skin. There is little subcutaneous tissue, and an injury to the ear that results in hematoma formation can cause pressure necrosis of the cartilage, infection, loss of shape and stability, and a poor cosmetic outcome. The goal of repair in ear lacerations is complete coverage of exposed cartilage (Fig. 18.14) and evacuation or prevention of hematoma.

Figure 18.14

 

Ear Laceration This patient has presented after sustaining an uncomplicated, linear laceration to the pinna. Closure must cover all exposed cartilage. (Courtesy of Alan B. Storrow, MD.)

Differential Diagnosis

In addition to simple lacerations of the ear, trauma to the ear may include abrasions, partial avulsions, soft tissue swelling, and perichondral hematomas.

Emergency Department Treatment and Disposition

Prior to laceration repair, the area is examined for signs of acute hematoma formation or other associated traumatic injuries. Hemotympanum or Battle's sign suggests the presence of a more serious closed head injury, especially basilar skull fracture. Blunt trauma may result in barotrauma to the eardrum, including perforation. Examination can be facilitated by local anesthesia infiltration or, in the case of larger or more complex lacerations, a field block.

Simple lacerations through the earlobe or involving the helix but that do not expose cartilage can be repaired with interrupted 6-0 nonabsorbable monofilament sutures. Simple lacerations that involve the cartilage are primarily repaired by ensuring complete coverage of the exposed cartilage by careful apposition of overlying skin. The skin generally provides sufficient support that no sutures are required for the cartilage itself. If the wound is irregular and cartilage debridement is required to avoid undue wound tension, the debridement is kept to a minimum. No more than 5 mm of cartilage can be removed or the cartilaginous skeleton may be deformed.

A perichondral hematoma must be drained within 72 h to prevent potential pressure necrosis and development of a "cauliflower" ear (see Figs. 1.26 and 1.27). Drainage is accomplished through a small incision directly over the hematoma and expression of coagulum. Ear wounds are best dressed with a mastoid pressure dressing either primarily or after later hematoma drainage. Such a dressing reduces the chances for future hematoma formation and its complications.

Ear sutures are removed in 3 to 5 days in children, 4 to 5 days in adults.

Clinical Pearls

1. Epinephrine-containing anesthetic agents are not to be used for ear lacerations.

2. Hematomas are rechecked in 24 h to evaluate for reaccumulation.

3. If cartilage has been exposed or a hematoma drained, antistaphylococcal antibiotic coverage is recommended.

4. Complex lacerations and hematomas of the ear are best cared for in conjunction with a consultant. (Fig. 18.15)

Figure 18.15

 

Ear Laceration After being assaulted with a glass bottle, a patient presents to the emergency department with a complex ear laceration, involving the tragus and peri-auricular area. Care must be taken to evaluate important structures in the area, including the parotid duct and seventh cranial nerve. (Courtesy of Matthew D. Sztajnkrycer, MD, PhD.)

 

Lip Lacerations

Associated Clinical Features

Lip lacerations may result in significant cosmetic defects if not properly repaired. The lip has two significant anatomic landmarks: the mucosal border, which divides intraoral and external portions of the lip, and the vermilion border, which separates the mucosa of the lip from the skin of the face. Another important anatomic structure of the lip is the underlying orbicularis oris muscle. Meticulous alignment of the vermilion border and its associated "white line" is the cornerstone of cosmetic repair. Lip anatomy may be distorted by the kinetic energy of the impact as well as the resultant edema surrounding the wound. Lacerations of the lip's vermilion border may be partial- or full-thickness, compromising the orbicularis oris.

Differential Diagnosis

Lacerations to the lip may not involve the vermilion border but may be limited to the mucosa or the intraoral portion. Facial lacerations in close proximity to the vermilion border may mimic a laceration that crosses the border. Other injuries—including abrasions, hematomas, and soft-tissue swelling—may initially mimic a vermilion border laceration.

Emergency Department Treatment and Disposition

Given the high bacterial content of the oral cavity, lip lacerations will not remain clean during the repair. The goal of irrigation is to remove gross contaminants such as tooth fragments or dirt. If tooth fractures are noted, the wound must be explored for fragments. A radiograph may also prove useful for foreign-body evaluation. Anesthesia for laceration repair is best performed using either an infraorbital (upper lip) or mental (lower lip) nerve block. Local infiltration may further distort tissues and obscure the alignment of the vermilion border.

If the vermilion border is violated by a superficial laceration, then the first suture, typically 6-0 in size, is placed at the vermilion border to reestablish anatomic relationships (see Fig. 6.13). Once alignment is judged adequate, simple interrupted sutures are used for completion. If the laceration extends within the oral cavity, absorbable 5-0 sutures are used to close the intraoral component.

With deep or "through and through" lacerations involving the orbicularis oris (Fig. 18.16), the muscle layers are initially approximated with deep, usually 5-0, absorbable sutures. Once the muscle is approximated, the first skin suture is again placed at the level of the vermilion border and the repair is completed as described above.

Figure 18.16

 

Complex Vermilion Border Laceration After being assaulted, this patient sustained a large laceration through the vermilion border and the orbicularis oris muscle. Examination of the wound demonstrated an underlying fracture of the alveolar ridge with subluxation of the number 10 tooth. (Courtesy of Matthew D. Sztajnkrycer, MD, PhD.)

Sutures are removed in 3 to 5 days in children, 4 to 5 days in adults. The patient is advised to eat soft foods, not to apply excessive force to the suture line, and to rinse after eating to prevent the accumulation of food particles.

Clinical Pearls

1. Misalignment of the vermilion border by as little as 1 mm may result in a cosmetically noticeable defect. Any repair of vermilion border lacerations should begin with alignment and suturing of this structure.

2. Regional anesthesia rather than local infiltration is optimal for repair, as it causes less distortion of the anatomic structures.

3. A marking pen may be used to identify landmarks prior to placing the sutures, as suturing itself causes some tissue edema, bleeding, and distortion.

4. Any patient with a lip laceration requires a thorough inspection of the oral cavity for associated trauma, including dental fractures, oral lacerations, and mandibular injuries.

 

Tendon Lacerations

Associated Clinical Features

Tendon injuries are often associated with lacerations to the hand or wrist. These injuries should be suspected either by the anatomic location of the laceration or when patients report an inability to flex or extend a digit or digits. A thorough neurovascular examination is critical to evaluate for associated injuries. Accurate assessment of motor function is necessary in any hand injury, although partial tendon injuries, including near complete (90%) tendon lacerations, may still result in normal mechanical function. Testing for strength might show diminished tendon function (Fig. 18.17), although function may be difficult to evaluate in the setting of an acute, painful injury. Any wound suspected of harboring a tendon laceration must be carefully explored in spite of normal testing.

Figure 18.17

 

Flexor Tendon Laceration The patient presented to the ED after sustaining a laceration to his third and fourth digits (A). The injury was associated with an inability to flex these two digits. Wound exploration revealed the distal segment of the transected flexor tendon apparatus (B). (Courtesy of Matthew D. Sztajnkrycer, MD, PhD.)

Differential Diagnosis

In addition to tendon lacerations, trauma may generate partial tendon lacerations, trauma to the tendon sheath, or bony injuries including avulsion fractures. In cases of remote injury, the differential diagnosis also includes bony injury, tenosynovitis, and arthritis.

Emergency Department Treatment and Disposition

Prior to wound examination, a thorough examination of the extremity is performed to assess neurovascular and motor function. All individual flexor and extensor tendons are assessed, including deep and superficial flexor digitorum tendons. Abnormal resting posture of the involved extremity can indicate tendon injury. Tendons are taken through a full range of motion, including re-creation of limb position at the time of injury, in order to detect injuries along the length of the tendon. Adequate tendon exploration requires excellent hemostasis, which can be achieved through direct pressure or the brief use of a blood pressure cuff or other tourniquet.

Initial wound care should include irrigation, exploration for foreign bodies, debridement, antibiotics, and tetanus prophylaxis if indicated.

Partial tendon lacerations are treated conservatively, with splinting in neutral position and appropriate follow-up. Extensor tendon lacerations (Fig. 18.18) can be repaired primarily in the ED under limited conditions and in consultation with a specialist. Flexor tendon lacerations require consultation (Fig. 18.19).

Figure 18.18

 

Extensor Tendon Laceration Note the laceration over the third metacarpal head. Inability to extend the long finger is strong clinical evidence of complete disruption of the extensor tendon. (Courtesy of Kevin J. Knoop, MD, MS.)

 

Figure 18.19

 

Flexor Tendon Laceration This patient with a palmar laceration is unable to flex his index finger secondary to complete disruption of the flexor tendon. (Courtesy of Daniel L. Savitt, MD.)

Clinical Pearls

1. Tendon function may remain unaffected despite a near complete tendon laceration.

2. All wounds with potential tendon lacerations are carefully explored through a full range of motion in order to detect lacerations along the course of the tendon.

3. Flexor tendon lacerations are immediately referred to a hand specialist.

 

Bite Wounds

Associated Clinical Features

Bites account for approximately 6% of all ED patients with traumatic wounds. Dog bites predominate (Fig. 18.20), at 60 to 80%, with cat bites accounting for another 5 to 15%. The frequency of human bites varies by institution but has been reported to range from 3.6 to 23%. Bite injuries are most likely to occur in children between age 5 and 14. The microbiology of bite wounds is frequently polymicrobial, but clinically relevant bacterial species include Pasteurella (P. multocida, P. canis, P. dagmatis), Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, Moraxella, and Enterococcus. The microbiology of human bites is more complex than that of cat and dog bites. Eikenella corrodens has been recovered from nearly 30% of all human bites, including 25% of all clenched-fist injuries. All mammalian bites are at risk for infection by anaerobic organisms such as Fusobacterium, Bacteroides, Porphyromonas, Prevotella, and Peptostreptococcus; human bites demonstrate the greatest risk of anaerobic infection.

Figure 18.20

 

Dog Bite An 8-year-old girl presented to the ED after being attacked by several dogs. She sustained multiple shearing lacerations to her chest and back. (Courtesy of Matthew D. Sztajnkrycer, MD, PhD.)

 

A number of risk factors are predictive of bite wound complications and influence wound management strategies. Three quarters of these wounds in adults occur on the extremities, but the majority of wounds in children occur on the face and head. The hand is at highest risk for developing infection (30%), while the most resistant anatomic location is the face (1.4 to 5.8%).

Wounds caused by fangs, especially cat fangs that penetrate deeply into tissues, are associated with a high risk of infection. Large open wounds caused by shearing, as seen in the bites of dogs or larger animals (Fig. 18.21), are less likely to become infected. Superficial lacerations with minimal tissue disruption are associated with a low risk of infection regardless of species.

Figure 18.21

 

Cougar Bite This patient has sustained large wounds as a result of a cougar attack. In contrast to the small penetrating injuries seen with house cat and small dog bites, the weight and force of large animals often results in shearing injuries. (Courtesy of Alan B. Storrow, MD.)

Emergency Department Treatment and Disposition

The management of bite wounds depends on location, wound type, severity, and signs of infection. Contusions and superficial abrasions may be treated with thorough cleansing, while larger wounds that violate the epidermis and dermis require standard wound care protocols. All devitalized tissue must be thoroughly debrided to reduce the possibility of wound infection. Copious pressure irrigation after debridement is recommended. Radiographs are obtained to exclude bony injury or retained dentition. Appropriate cultures can be obtained in purulent wounds, although the polymicrobial results usually do not affect management.

Closure of dog bites is not recommended for wounds more than 8 to 12 h old, puncture wounds, hand lacerations, or high-risk wounds. Because of the excellent blood supply, bite wounds on the face may be considered for closure after 8 to 12 h. Cat bites and scratch wounds are best left open and treated with thorough irrigation and debridement. Large, easily irrigated human bites less than 12 h old on the trunk or a proximal extremity may be sutured with a single layer of nonabsorbable suture material. Facial bites without evidence of infection and less than 12 h old may likewise be closed. Other human bites should generally be left open and considered for delayed primary closure. Clenched-fist injuries are left open and managed in consultation with a hand specialist.

For established infections caused by cat and dog bites, empiric antibiotic therapy is started with broad-spectrum antibiotics such as ampicillin-sulbactam, cefoxitin, or ceftriaxone, alternatively, ciprofloxacin and clindamycin can be used. In children, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole may be substituted for ciprofloxacin. Infection by P. multocida classically starts within 24 h of the bite, is marked by prominent pain and swelling, and is associated with a serosanguineous gray exudate. The antibiotic of choice for Pasteurella is penicillin; doxycycline is an alternative. Antibiotics are used for nearly all bite wounds, although the efficacy of this approach has not been substantiated. Amoxicillin-clavulanate or dicloxacillin plus penicillin are suggested regimens to cover typical skin flora and Pasteurella species.

Clinical Pearls

1. Fang puncture wounds may be carefully widened using a number 15 scalpel blade to improve irrigation. The incised wound is left open to close by secondary intention.

2. All patients with bite wounds from susceptible animals are assessed for rabies exposure as well as tetanus status.

3. Given cosmetic concerns and low infection risk, dog bites to the face can be sutured even after 8 to 12 h.

4. Although rare, a potentially fatal cause of dog-bite infection is Capnocytophaga canimorsus (CDC group DF-2), a gram-negative rod. Patients with this infection are often immunocompromised or asplenic and may present with sepsis and disseminated intravascular coagulation. The recommended antibiotic for treatment is amoxicillin-clavulanate.

 

Fishhook Injuries

Associated Clinical Features

Because of their design and nature, accidental impalement with fishhooks poses problems with removal. Often, the hook cannot be removed by the patient because of the barbs. Several different methods have been described to remove fishhooks (Fig. 18.22).

Figure 18.22

 

Fishhook Removal Hooks with small barbs that are only superficially embedded may be carefully backed out through the original puncture site (A and B). This may require a small incision, made in line with the concavity of the curve of the hook. The push-through technique is useful for hooks with large barbs or those more deeply embedded. The hook is pushed out through the skin, the barb removed, and the remainder of the hook subsequently removed through the original penetration site (C, D, and E). The traction (string) technique provides an alternative for removing hooks with small barbs. While pressing down on the shaft of the hook, traction is applied with 0 silk or umbilical tape. A swift yank of the cord in the direction opposite the barb will dislodge the hook (F). Care is taken to warn bystanders of the potential for the fishhook to fly across the room.

Emergency Department Treatment and Disposition

The wound is thoroughly cleaned and irrigated. Tetanus status is determined. After adequate anesthesia has been obtained, several different removal methods may be employed depending upon the location and type of hook.

Superficially embedded hooks or hooks with small barbs may be removed in a retrograde fashion, by backing the hook out through the original site of penetration. A small incision is frequently required in line with the concavity of the fishhook. A technique utilizing string has also been described. The string should have good tensile strength, such as 0-silk or umbilical tape. The string is looped around the curved portion of the hook and then carefully and gently pulled in a direction parallel to and away from the shaft of hook. At the same time, the shaft and eyelet are depressed against the skin and slightly rotated to disengage the barbs. The string is then sharply pulled, releasing the hook. This technique has the advantage of not requiring anesthesia.

The most common and successful removal technique is the "push-through and cut" technique. This is recommended for deeply embedded hooks or hooks with large barbs. Basic skin preparation and local wound infiltration are performed in the standard manner. The hook shaft is manipulated with a hemostat in order to push the hook and barbs through the dermis (Fig. 18.23). The end of the hook and barb is removed with wire cutters and the shaft is backed out through the wound.

Figure 18.23

 

Fishhook Injury and Removal A patient presented to the ED with a fishhook embedded in his finger. The push-through technique was used to remove the hook. Use of a ring cutter proved unsuccessful; a bolt cutter was eventually required to remove the distal portion of this large hook. (Courtesy of Alan B. Storrow, MD.)

Clinical Pearls

1. Thorough irrigation and debridement of devitalized tissue is necessary after removal of the fishhook.

2. Hooks embedded in cartilaginous structures, such as the ear or nose, are best managed with the push-through methods.

3. Hooks that penetrate joint spaces are removed with the push-through technique, as fine barbs may break off with the retrograde technique. These wounds should be managed in consultation with an orthopedic surgeon.

4. Fishhooks that penetrate the globe of the eye are left in place and emergent ophthalmologic consultation obtained. The patient is placed in the semirecumbent position to decrease intraocular pressure and the globe is protected with an eye shield. Pressure patches are contraindicated, as they may extrude intraocular contents.

 

Simple Wound Closures

Associated Clinical Features

The majority of wounds seen in the ED are uncomplicated lacerations generated from shearing or flap injuries and are readily amenable to primary wound closure. Each wound will have different technical factors that influence the repair. The cornerstones of wound closure are layer matching, wound edge eversion, and prevention of excessive wound edge tension.

In repairing any laceration, it is important to suture individual layers to their counterparts (e.g., superficial fascia to superficial fascia). Failure to do so may result in improper healing and poor cosmetic results. Wound edge eversion is equally important in the initial repair, as scars have a tendency to contract over time. Everted wounds flatten with scar maturation, while noneverted wounds contract into linear pits, with resultant poor cosmetic results (Figs. 18.24, 18.25).

Figures 18.24 and 18.25

 

Wound Edge Eversion Eversion of wound edges is critical for optimal wound healing. For proper eversion, the needle point should enter the epidermis at a 90-degree angle, generating a square or bottle-shaped suture configuration 18.24A. This results in a slight rise of the skin edges above the skin plane 18.25A. Such eversion will flatten at the level of the skin plane during healing. Entry at a shallower angle 18.24B often leads to wound edge inversion, eventual contraction of the wound edges below the skin plane, and subsequent scar formation 18.25B.

The repair of any wound will place a degree of tension upon the wound. Excessive wound tension by the sutures may result in impaired capillary blood flow to the healing wound, with possible necrosis and a cosmetically unacceptable scar. The first suture throw is critical in determining the amount of tension on the wound. When brought together, wound edges should just touch and be slightly everted, as wound edges tend to become slightly edematous after repair.

Emergency Department Treatment and Disposition

All laceration repairs should begin with a thorough evaluation. Tetanus status is addressed. Different wound closure techniques include simple interrupted sutures, staples, running sutures, dermal sutures, tissue adhesives, and tape (Steri-Strips). Suture material, size, and duration before removal are determined by the anatomic site of the wound (Table 18.2). Use of deep, absorbable sutures may be necessary to reduce wound tension before superficial repair (Fig. 18.26).

Table 18.2 Suture Materials, Size, and Duration by Anatomic Site

 

Anatomic Site

Skin

Deep

Duration

Scalp

5-0, 4-0 Monofilament

4-0 Absorbable

6–8 days

Ear

6-0 Monofilament

N/A

4–5 days

Eyelid

7-0, 6-0 Monofilament

N/A

4–5 days

Eyebrow

6-0, 5-0 Monofilament

5-0 Absorbable

4–5 days

Nose

6-0 Monofilament

5-0 Absorbable

4–5 days

Lip

6-0 Monofilament

5-0 Absorbable

4–5 days

Oral mucosa

N/Aa
 

5-0 Absorbable

N/A

Face/forehead

6-0 Monofilament

5-0 Absorbable

4–5 days

Chest/abdomen

5-0, 4-0 Monofilament

3-0 Absorbable

8–10 days

Back

5-0, 4-0 Monofilament

3-0 Absorbable

12–14 days

Arm/leg

5-0, 4-0 Monofilament

4-0 Absorbable

8–10 days

Hand

5-0 Monofilament

5-0 Absorbable

8–10 daysb
 

Extensor tendon

4-0 Monofilament

N/A

N/A

Foot/sole

4-0, 3-0 Monofilament

4-0 Absorbable

12–14 days

 

a Not applicable.

b Add 2 to 3 days for joint extensor surfaces.

Source: Adapted from Trott AT: Wounds and Lacerations: Emergency Care and Closure, 2d ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby–Year Book, 1997.

 

Figure 18.26

 

Deep Sutures Judicious placement of deep sutures allows approximation of the dermis, reduces tension on the wound edges, and may facilitate final superficial closure. The needle is driven from deep within the wound to a superficial level (A). On the opposite side of the wound, the needle is driven from superficial to deep (B). By having the leading and trailing suture come out on the deep side and on the same side of the superficial cross suture (B). The resultant knot is buried within the wound (C).

Simple Interrupted Closures

This closure involves single nonabsorbable sutures, each independently tied (Figs. 18.27, 18.28). They can provide excellent wound edge approximation and are the most common type of wound closure used in the ED.

Figures 18.27 and 18.28

 

Simple Interrupted Wound Closure An uncomplicated linear laceration generated by a sharp object. For anesthesia and hemostasis, the wound edges are infiltrated with lidocaine containing epinephrine. The wound is subsequently closed with simple interrupted sutures. Attention is paid to obtaining a degree of wound edge eversion (Courtesy of Alan B. Storrow, MD.)

Staples

Studies have demonstrated that staples, a rapid means of closing linear wounds, engender less inflammatory response, resist infection more effectively, and generate greater wound tensile strength than sutures. Staples are best utilized in repairing linear, sharp lacerations of the scalp, trunk, and extremities (Fig. 18.29). Staples are not used on the face, over joints, or on the hands or feet.

Figure 18.29

 

Staple Closure Meticulous care must be taken when using staples to properly approximate and evert wound edges. This can be facilitated through the use of forceps during staple closure.

Running Closure

This rapid closure technique involves taking several bites along the length of a wound without tying individual knots. Knots are tied only at the beginning and end. This method is most useful for superficial linear lacerations greater than 5 cm in length. Particular care must be taken to achieve equal wound tensions with each bite. Proper wound eversion may be difficult.

Dermal Closures

Also known as the subcuticular closure, this technique involves the use of absorbable sutures placed in the superficial fascia and dermis, with the knot buried in the wound. The dermal closure may be achieved using either simple interrupted or running techniques. When properly performed, it provides excellent cosmetic results and avoids the need for suture removal.

Wound Adhesives

Cyanoacrylate adhesives have advantages in wound closure because of speed of closure, reported low infection rate, lack of repeat visit for suture removal, and no anesthesia requirement. Wounds closed using adhesives are at increased risk of immediate dehiscence, but no difference in tensile strength has been reported at 7 days. The wound edges must be approximated during application; thus two operators may be required for optimal closure. Proper application requires considerable practice in technique.

Clinical Pearls

1. In order to obtain proper wound edge eversion, the point of the needle should generally enter the epidermis and dermis at a 90-degree angle before it is brought around through the tissue.

2. The bites on both sides of a wound should be equidistant for both optimum wound healing and cosmetic outcome.

3. In gaping wounds, surface tension may be reduced with the use of deep sutures. The minimum number of such sutures is used because they may act as a foreign body and a potential nidus for infection. Deep sutures also stimulate a greater healing response and may therefore generate a larger final scar.

4. Use of cyanoacrylate wound adhesives does not obviate the need for good wound care, including thorough irrigation and exploration. Local or regional anesthesia may still be required.

 

Complex Wound Closures

Associated Clinical Features

Although the majority of lacerations can be managed by using simple wound closure techniques, certain lacerations require more advanced techniques. These include the horizontal and vertical mattress stitch and the corner stitch.

Emergency Department Treatment and Disposition

The vertical mattress suture is a useful technique for generating wound edge eversion, particularly in deep wounds (Fig. 18.30). The suture is performed by first taking a large tissue bite through the fascial layer approximately 1 to 1.5 cm from the wound edge and crossing equidistant to the other wound edge. The needle is then reversed and a second small bite through the epidermal-dermal junction 1 to 2 mm from the wound edge is taken. This suture has several additional advantages. It acts as both a deep and superficial closure, thereby reducing wound tension. It is particularly useful in areas of marked skin laxity, such as the dorsum of the hand.

Figure 18.30

 

Vertical Mattress Suture The suture is placed by first taking a large deep bite of tissue approximately 1 cm away from the wound edge and exiting at the same location on the other side of the wound. A second small superficial bite is then performed in the reverse direction (A). When the bites are complete (B), tying results in nice apposition of the wound edges (C). This technique is especially useful in areas of lax skin, such as the elbow or dorsum of the hand.

 

The horizontal mattress suture may also be used to optimize wound edge eversion (Fig. 18.31). With this suture, the needle is introduced through the skin in the standard manner for a simple interrupted stitch. Rather than tie the knot at this point, a second bite is taken approximately 5 mm from the first. The knot is subsequently tied on the side of the initial bite. As well as causing wound edge eversion, this technique is particularly useful in areas under significant tension, such as the knee.

Figure 18.31

 

Horizontal Mattress Suture Useful in achieving wound edge eversion, the horizontal mattress suture begins with a standard suture throw. A second bite is taken approximately half a centimeter from the first exit (A) and brought through at the original starting edge, half a centimeter from the original entry point (B and C).

 

Many wounds result in the generation of jagged irregular wound margins, with triangular corners or small flaps. These wounds have tenuous vascular supplies, and improper suturing may further compromise the viability of the tissue. A common technique for securing the triangular corner of a wound without further compromising the small capillary beds is the corner stitch (Figs. 18.32, 18.33, 18.34). The technique is effectively a half-buried mattress suture, where the needle is initially introduced through the skin in the noncorner area of the wound. The needle is brought out through the dermis and then passed horizontally through the dermis of the triangular portion of the wound. It is then brought through the dermis on the other portion of the wound and out through the opposite noncorner area, where the knot is tied. Once the corner is secured, simple sutures are used to repair the rest of the wound, with care taken to place the sutures far enough from the tip to optimize circulation.

Figure 18.32

 

Corner Stitch Flaps generated by partial avulsion injuries must be repaired with care to avoid compromising the tenuous blood supply of the flap. A corner stitch is an excellent technique that can solve many tricky wound problems. (Courtesy of Matthew D. Sztajnkrycer, MD, PhD.)

 

Figure 18.33

 

Corner Stitch The corner stitch is performed through the use of a half-buried horizontal mattress suture. The suture begins percutaneously away from the corner of the wound. The suture needle is then brought horizontally through the corner at the level of the dermis and back out through the epidermis at the opposite noncorner portion of the wound (A). This technique avoids placing suture material near the apex of the flap (B).

 

Figure 18.34

 

Corner Stitch for Stellate Wounds The corner stitch may also be used to close stellate lacerations, as described in Fig. 18.33.

Clinical Pearls

1. Utilization of a mattress suture can aid in wound edge eversion, dead space removal, and tension reduction.

2. A single corner stitch may be used to close several corners of a stellate wound. The corner stitch is one of the most useful techniques in the ED management of complex wounds.

 

Wound Care Complications

Associated Clinical Features

Despite appropriate and meticulous care, all wounds are subject to three main complications: infection, dehiscence, and hypertrophic scar formation. Nearly all wounds evaluated in the ED have occurred under nonsterile conditions and should be considered contaminated. Disruption of the epidermis allows a portal of entry for skin flora, while contaminants may harbor microorganisms. Bacterial concentrations vary depending upon the anatomic location; the highest epidermal bacterial concentrations are found on the scalp, axillae, mouth, feet, nail folds, and perineum. A key factor in determining bacterial concentration in the wound is time elapsed until presentation. Wounds should therefore be thoroughly cleaned and irrigated in a timely manner following presentation. Wound infection is suggested by pain, warmth, erythema, edema, and purulent drainage from the wound site (Fig. 18.35).

Figure 18.35

 

Postoperative Wound Infection The patient presented to the ED with increasing pain and redness at the site of his staple closure. The area was erythematous, tender, and warm and had scant purulent drainage around some of the staples. (Courtesy of Matthew D. Sztajnkrycer, MD, PhD.)

 

Wound healing occurs via a structured process of epithelialization, neovascularization, collagen synthesis, wound contraction, and remodeling. New collagen fibril synthesis occurs by day 2, and peak synthesis occurs by day 5 to 7. Damaged collagen is subsequently degraded by proteolytic enzymes and replaced with the newly synthesized collagen. A nadir in wound strength occurs between days 7 and 10; during this weakest point, which frequently coincides with suture removal, the wound is at risk for dehiscence (Fig. 18.36) or breakdown. Factors that may contribute to wound dehiscence by impairing wound healing include infection, drugs (especially corticosteroids), foreign bodies, advanced age, poor nutritional status, diabetes mellitus, and peripheral vascular disease.

Figure 18.36

 

Wound Dehiscence After suture removal, the patient returned to the ED. The wound had dehisced but had a clean base of granulation tissue. The wound was allowed to close by secondary intention. (Courtesy of Alan B. Storrow, MD.)

 

At the opposite extreme to wound dehiscence, wound healing may occur in an exaggerated manner, resulting in hypertrophic scars and keloid formation (Fig. 18.37). Hypertrophic scars are the result of excessive collagen deposition within the borders of the original wound, generating excessive scar bulk. These wounds occur at areas of increased tissue stress. Keloids represent inappropriate scarring that extends beyond the boundaries of the original wound. While keloids are most commonly described in the African-American population, they may occur in any darkly pigmented skin areas.

Figure 18.37

 

Keloid The degree of excessive scar bulk extending beyond the original wound margins may be dramatic and cosmetically significant. (Courtesy of Thea James, MD.)

Emergency Department Treatment and Disposition

Sutures and staples represent foreign bodies within the wound and generate varying degrees of inflammatory reaction. Local wound infections are treated with suture removal and thorough irrigation and drainage as well as possible radiographic and visual exploration of the wound for missed foreign bodies. A 7-day course of a first-generation cephalosporin or antistaphylococcal penicillin is appropriate for most infections. For animal bites, other antibiotics may be more appropriate. More advanced wound infections, including those with evidence of lymphangitic streaking and systemic toxicity, should be managed with parenteral antibiotics.

Wound dehiscence is treated conservatively by treating the underlying causes and allowing healing via secondary intention. Dehiscence of wounds in cosmetically sensitive areas is best managed in conjunction with a consultant.

Hypertrophic scars and keloids are managed in conjunction with a consultant. Treatment modalities include corticosteroids, compressive dressings, surgical excision, and radiation therapy.

Clinical Pearls

1. All accidental wounds are considered contaminated and treated as such. Thorough irrigation and cleansing is of paramount importance in preventing wound infection.

2. Expedient ED wound care is important, since bacterial contamination increases over time.

3. The tensile strength of the wound reaches its nadir between 7 to 10 days.

4. All patients with wounds in areas of increased tissue stress and a history of hypertrophic scarring are treated with splinting and physical therapy to minimize the risk of excessive scarring.

 


Copyright ©2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies.  All rights reserved.
Privacy Notice. Any use is subject to the Terms of Use and Notice.  Additional Credits and Copyright Information.

McGraw-Hill Education

A Silverchair Information System

The McGraw-Hill Companies